Obama supports same-sex marriage for 2-peat
The theory has been that Obama was like most other politicians and will openly support an issue ONLY if it benefits his political career (votes). Obama’s recent admission that he supports same-sex marriage has tested that theory and has proven it factual. Of course, politicians’ playing the field for votes isn’t new; it simply appears Obama plays the game better than most other politicians, especially the GOP. A “great” politician once had a bad connotation; it was the equivalent to the ole snake oil salesman selling hope but you got dope ( ingredients often cocaine). Obama looks to have held this same-sex marriage card for when he may have needed it most. I never believed Obama was against same-sex marriage, I often thought that issue was too costly for him to use to gain that 50% plus one of the electorate. Today Obama sees in order to 2-peat in November he must do the “kitchen sink” approach. You can definitely see the kitchen sink approach in action; recently Obama has tried to appease young voters by selling the low interest rate college loans issue to them, I’m sure to get them out in numbers similar to 2008. And For the past 2 years he has been selling himself to low and middle income voters by developing a “Robin Hood” complex (taking from others to give and gain political favor). Obama sees no gray, it’s only cost, benefits and the probability of him being on the right side of an issue according to public opinion at any given time. Obama and his people have surely polled to measure the affects either way, for or against same-sex marriage.
God and Science Opposes Homosexuality
What amazes me (no it doesn’t) is that many so-called liberal intellects are promoting a behavior that goes against their evolutionary science teachings.
Survival of a species is through reproduction; in humans if you believe in evolution and natural selection, Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance states that genes are programmed to rid out any behavior that would go against reproduction, even if it’s at a cost to the individual. That means behavior in humans such as homosexuality is not beneficial to reproduction in the population and therefore is no part of human evolution. It is true we are born with certain behaviors and survival of the species is an innate behavior that wires us to produce offspring’s, it’s in our DNA. Behaviors that reduce an individuals reproductive output (relative to the population) are not likely to evolve, natural selection favors individual’s producing more offspring relative to those producing fewer offspring (What is Life? Jay Phelan Ch.9). And “if” a scenario where a homosexual gene (allele) appeared more frequent in a population (maybe through mutation), it will cause a lesser reproductive output which might spell doom for the species.
I am against same-sex marriage because of both science and religion, but I am not against the person. I believe God is the science behind the science in which we study. If we evolved from the sea than God created all the mechanisms to allow that to happen. God is “The Creator” and he created us in his image and part of that image is for us to create. Sidenote: We say “He” to connect God to our understanding, we have to assign human terms because his description is far greater than what we can communicate otherwise.
There is one passage in the Bible where the innate behavior to reproduce was instilled in man by God, Genesis 1: 27-29,
27 So God created mankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them.
28 God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground. ”
So either way you look at it, homosexuality is not a trait wired into our DNA and therefore is not beneficial to the human population, I didn’t say it, God and science said it, which do you believe?